top of page

The Hidden Cost of Managing Too Many Manufacturing Suppliers

2 days ago
4 min read
The Hidden Cost of Managing Too Many Manufacturing Suppliers

Manufacturers are using more suppliers than before. The RS/CIPS Indirect Procurement Report 2025 found that businesses are using 18% more suppliers, while MRO expenditure has increased by 20%.


More suppliers can reduce reliance on a single source and give manufacturers access to different capabilities. But every additional supplier also creates more quotations, purchase orders, invoices, contracts and communication to manage.

The real question is not "How many suppliers should we have?" It is "When does another supplier add value, and when does it add unnecessary cost and complexity?"



Where Supplier Complexity Starts to Cost Manufacturers

Where Supplier Complexity Starts to Cost Manufacturers

Having multiple suppliers is not automatically a problem. It becomes an issue when procurement teams spend increasing amounts of time managing suppliers, while gaining little additional value from them.


For example, five suppliers providing five different specialised components may be necessary. Five suppliers providing similar standard parts may create unnecessary administrative work.


This hidden cost becomes clearer when looking at how much work sits behind each purchase.



3 Hidden Costs of Managing Multiple Suppliers

3 Hidden Costs of Managing Multiple Suppliers

1. Every Purchase Has a Cost

The cost of buying a component is more than its purchase price.

A purchase can involve quotations, approvals, purchase orders, delivery coordination, invoice processing and issue resolution.


The RS/CIPS Indirect Procurement Report 2025 estimates that the average business spends £89 per order — approximately S$151 at the time of writing.


Even more importantly, 59% of procurement teams do not know their actual processing cost.

For manufacturers handling hundreds or thousands of purchases, these administrative costs can quickly become significant.


2. MRO Creates Disproportionate Procurement Work

MRO — Maintenance, Repair and Operations — shows how purchasing volume can become disconnected from spending.



That means MRO may represent a relatively small share of manufacturing costs while creating a very large share of purchasing activity.


When these purchases are spread across many suppliers, procurement teams may have less visibility over:

  • What they are buying

  • How much they are spending

  • Which suppliers provide similar items

  • Whether purchases follow existing contracts

  • Where consolidation could make sense

The result is more purchasing activity without necessarily creating more value.


3. More Suppliers Can Mean Less Visibility

Supplier complexity also affects how much manufacturers know about their supply chains. McKinsey's 2026 analysis found that more than 90% of surveyed companies had visibility into their direct (Tier 1) suppliers, but less than half had visibility into Tier 2 suppliers further upstream.


The further down the supply chain a company looks, the less visibility it may have.

This matters because weak supply chain transparency can lead to higher costs, larger inventory buffers and reduced cash flow, according to McKinsey.


More suppliers do not automatically create more risk. But managing a larger network without enough visibility can make risks harder to identify and respond to.



Should Manufacturers Reduce Their Number of Suppliers?

Should Manufacturers Reduce Their Number of Suppliers?

Not necessarily.


Supplier consolidation can reduce administrative work when multiple suppliers provide similar products or services.


For example, if five suppliers provide the same standard component, a manufacturer may be able to work with two or three reliable suppliers instead. This can reduce the number of purchase orders, contracts and supplier relationships that need to be managed.


However, reducing suppliers too aggressively can create dependency on the remaining suppliers.


For critical or specialised components, maintaining alternative suppliers may be important for resilience.


The OECD Supply Chain Resilience Review 2025 highlights this trade-off: diversification can improve resilience, but it can also increase complexity.


The goal is therefore not to have the fewest suppliers.


It is to have the right number of suppliers for the products and risks involved.



How Manufacturers Can Reduce Supplier Complexity


1. Identify Where Suppliers Overlap

Review the supplier base by looking at:

  • Total spending

  • Number of orders

  • Products supplied

  • Lead times

  • Quality performance

  • Supplier location

This can reveal where several suppliers are providing similar products or capabilities.


2. Measure the Cost of Procurement Activity

Do not only track the price of the product.

Track:

  • Number of purchase orders

  • Processing time

  • Cost per order

  • Contract compliance

  • Supplier performance

This helps identify where procurement teams are spending time without creating proportional value.


3. Consolidate Routine Purchases

Where several suppliers provide similar standard parts or MRO items, consolidation may reduce purchasing activity and improve visibility.

However, critical or specialised components may still require multiple suppliers.


4. Improve Supplier Visibility

Manufacturers should be able to quickly understand:

  • Who supplies each product

  • Where it is produced

  • Whether orders are on schedule

  • What capacity is available

  • What alternatives exist

Better visibility makes it easier to decide which suppliers to keep, consolidate or add.



How Imajin Supports Manufacturing Supplier Networks

For manufacturers, finding a supplier is only part of the challenge. They also need to know whether the supplier has the right capability, quality and production capacity.

Imajin connects businesses with manufacturing capabilities across prototyping, tooling, production and supply chain activities. For Singapore companies exploring Indonesia, this provides another way to access and evaluate manufacturing partners as their production needs grow.


The key takeaway: supplier diversification can improve resilience, but an increasingly fragmented supplier base can also create hidden procurement costs.

Manufacturers should focus less on simply adding or removing suppliers and more on building a supplier network that provides the right capabilities while remaining manageable, visible and cost-effective.


📩 For further information or collaboration:


Melisa Aprilia

Supervisor of Business & Digital Development

Website: Imajin.id


Explore the Imajin Platform

Discover our digital manufacturing solutions and start your next project today.

Imajin Platform

Comments


bottom of page